[bind10-dev] [sprint planning] estimates for sprint ending 2012-04-03

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

Hello

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:33:23AM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> I agree. The next requirements document I'm working on is bindctl. I
> hope to have a version for review in the next week or so.

The requirements are for how it behaves to the user. I'm talking about internal
data structures, which are just ad-hoc mix of dicts and lists. I believe at
least me and Jelte have some pretty concrete idea what we want to do (without
changing the external behaviour, with the exception of „accidentally“ fixing few
bugs). I don't think there's a need of requirements for that. We might or might
not need a design document for that (or an interface of the base class, which is
often less work and is more exact).

What I wanted to say is, do we really want to fix these bugs by tweaking the
ad-hoc data structures and cursing the mess there, if we really need to do some
classes of them and the bugs could possibly be gone by themselfs?

With regards

-- 
I still miss Windows, but my aim is getting better.

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20120320/932c4da7/attachment.bin>