[bind10-dev] why -i for --no-kill?
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Wed Mar 28 00:42:54 UTC 2012
% ~/opt/sbin/bind10 -h
Usage: bind10 [options]
Options:
[...]
-i, --no-kill do not send SIGTERM and SIGKILL signals to modules
during shutdown
[...]
"-i" doesn't seem to be an intuitive abbreviation for "--no-kill".
Is that intentional, or maybe a leftover of the joked version of the
option (--no-kill-i)? See: http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1819#comment:11
If it's the latter, it should better be renamed.
If it's the former, well, I'd still suggest renaming it because it's
not intuitive.
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list