[bind10-dev] recent performance improvements

[Larissa Shapiro]

I applaud this result.

Well done.

Larissa


On Mar 28, 2012, at 12:16, "Jeremy C. Reed" <jreed at isc.org> wrote:

> This is BIND 10's improvement over this month since last release (on the 
> Linux system):
> 
> root-memory-cpus4.nxdomain 76075.579451 qps 16% improvement
> root-memory-cpus4.soa 62792.307593 qps 159% improvement
> root-memory-cpus4.success 59204.381375 qps 163% improvement
> root-memory-.nxdomain 38676.547656 qps 31% improvement
> root-memory-.soa 21394.156749 qps 248% improvement
> root-memory-.success 21501.085434 qps 258% improvement
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.nxdomain 75948.789878 qps 17% improvement
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.soa 76225.764785 qps 21% improvement
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.success 75277.493475 qps 16% improvement
> smallzone-memory-.nxdomain 40796.679890 qps 44% improvement
> smallzone-memory-.soa 38008.901511 qps 54% improvement
> smallzone-memory-.success 38889.999055 qps 52% improvement
> 
> The following is comparisons to BIND 9.9.0 with threads -n 1. -n 4 is 
> also compared with four b10-auth servers. On the Linux system:
> 
> root-memory-cpus4.nxdomain 76075.579451 qps 11% faster
> root-memory-cpus4.soa 62792.307593 qps 3% faster
> root-memory-cpus4.success 59204.381375 qps 33% faster
> root-memory-.nxdomain 38676.547656 qps 5% faster
> root-memory-.soa 21394.156749 qps 13% slower
> root-memory-.success 21501.085434 qps 34% faster
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.nxdomain 75948.789878 qps 8% faster
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.soa 76225.764785 qps 12% faster
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.success 75277.493475 qps 8% faster
> smallzone-memory-.nxdomain 40796.679890 qps 1% faster
> smallzone-memory-.soa 38008.901511 qps 7% faster
> smallzone-memory-.success 38889.999055 qps 5% faster
> 
> I have a few more test cases to also report on. I am now using the same 
> set of scripts (stored in git) on MacOS and on Linux to generate some 
> reports. I hope to help with a blog article on this within a week.
> 
> I also have macmini results versus BIND 9.9.0, but don't consider them 
> too accurate. I need to make sure no other heavy services or jobs are 
> going on at the same time.
> 
> root-memory-.nxdomain 34416.501217 qps 14% slower
> root-memory-.soa 17150.547136 qps 26% slower
> root-memory-.success 17204.327813 qps 16% faster
> root-memory-cpus4.nxdomain 25088.150922 qps 25% slower
> but another time it was 2% faster and  32792.762246 qps
> root-memory-cpus4.soa 21092.460988 qps 52% faster
> root-memory-cpus4.success 21830.332103 qps 57% faster
> smallzone-memory-.nxdomain 34267.082050 qps 19% slower
> smallzone-memory-.soa 34209.730366 qps 10% slower
> smallzone-memory-.success 34469.664609 qps 12% slower
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.nxdomain 33240.307671 qps 7% slower
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.soa 31214.336175 qps 0% faster
> smallzone-memory-cpus4.success 33798.697208 qps 2% faster
> _______________________________________________
> bind10-dev mailing list
> bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev