[bind10-dev] some suggested topics for the team call
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Tue Oct 2 07:29:57 UTC 2012
I also want to manage the time slot for each topic better (again) by
giving a specific time period so we won't easily consume all 90
minutes.
- Revisit poorer progress in recent sprints and how we can improve it
- managing review queue
- setting clearer priority
- possibly better use of daily call
- possibly using historical statistics (needed hours, gap between
estimation and actual, etc)
- ever lasting homework. these seem to get stuck, but for the beta
release I guess these are becoming more important and urgent.
- making bind10.isc.org top page nicer/more user friendly
- security procedure status update, set up separate repository,
practice, etc.
- DB backend usage
it doesn't make sense to discuss what kind of DB we use and how we
optimize it without knowing who wants to use it. Personally I've
never heard the expected usage; it's always been guess. We really
need this info, and if we currently don't have it, need to plan to
get it.
- PostgreSQL vs MySQL
People talk about PostgreSQL backend for BIND 10 recently, but from
my quick experiments, it has some missing feature in C API
(https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/2012-October/003868.html)
and (at least in very limited benchmark scenarios) generally slower
than MySQL (see, eg.
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/2012-October/003866.html)
MySQL also supports query cache while PostgreSQL doesn't. Depending
on query usage it's another advantage of MySQL. I have no
personal reason for pushing MySQL, but experimental facts so far
seem to indicate MySQL is probably the better choice for our next
target.
- How to improve query performance with DB backend
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/2012-October/003866.html
It involves substantial schema changes. The timing of supporting
another backend is probably a good opportunity to do this type of
change.
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list