[bind10-dev] coding guidelines

[Francis Dupont]

> So, is your concern that since how <> or "" works is
> implementation-defined, we cannot reliably assume anything anyway, in
> theory?

=> I have two concerns:
 - the first one is very theorical and is the standard doesn't really
  specify something useful. But again it is in theory so without
  a concrete counter-example in a system or compiler you support,
  it should not become an issue
 - the second is about the < > fallback: it makes impossible to enforce
  the choice of the "right" include, or with other words there is no
  provable protection against errors. IMHO this makes the " " variant
  far less attractive...

Regards

Francis Dupont <fdupont at isc.org>