[bind10-dev] XfrIn validation failure handling in bind9

[Shane Kerr]

Michal,

On Friday, 2013-01-25 13:15:42 +0100, 
Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz> wrote:
> I believe it is easier for bind10 to act the current way (returning
> to previous version), as we don't have a way to mark zone as „don't
> serve“ currently and wiping the data completely seems wrong. Do you
> think it would be problematic in some way?

For the record, I agree that the BIND 10 method is less wrong. :)

I am not sure about the motivation for the BIND 9 approach....

Cheers,

--
Shane
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20130131/996292f1/attachment.bin>