[bind10-dev] take 2: design and inter-process protocol for shared memory
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Thu Mar 14 18:48:34 UTC 2013
At Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:20:03 +0100,
Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz> wrote:
One more thing:
> • The ACK. If the Update is a command, it would feel natural to send the ACK as
> the actual result of the command, not a separate command. The manager could
> then use some kind of rpcCallAsync (once create that), to simplify its code.
> The unmap-map should be a fast operation in my understanding.
>
> Also, for simplicity, I think we should just be sending the ACK every time.
> Omitting it on startup won't give us any benefit and it'll be some additional
> handling.
Regarding the latter part, that's one option. I thought it's useful
for the manager if it can determine whether an ack is really expected
or a kind of error (sent by someone not requested).
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list