BIND 10 #54: naming convention: RRSet vs RRset

[BIND 10 Development]

#54: naming convention: RRSet vs RRset
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  jinmei         |        Owner:  jinmei 
     Type:  enhancement    |       Status:  closed 
 Priority:  minor          |    Milestone:         
Component:  DNSPacket API  |   Resolution:  wontfix
 Keywords:                 |    Sensitive:  0      
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by shane):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => wontfix


Comment:

 Would be nice to have RRSet for consistency, but consensus is it is not
 important. Closing!

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/54#comment:1>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development