BIND 10 #441: MemoryZone refactor
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Tue Dec 21 12:49:37 UTC 2010
#441: MemoryZone refactor
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: vorner | Owner: UnAssigned
Type: task | Status: reviewing
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: data source | Resolution:
Keywords: | Sensitive: 0
Estimatedhours: 0.0 | Hours: 0
Billable: 1 | Totalhours: 0
Internal: 0 |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by vorner):
* owner: vorner => UnAssigned
* status: new => reviewing
Comment:
It is ready for review, in the branches/trac441 branch, between r3911 and
r3931.
Few notes. It is 3 sprint tasks together (they kind of depend on each
other and I had it in local git repo until today, because the RBTree
wasn't merged, so I just put it there at once, it is the base task
MemoryZone, then MemoryZone::find and MemoryZone::load).
The find does handle delegation, because it was like 5 more lines of code
and it seemed like comparable amount of work to adding TODO. It, however,
returns SOA, not NS, because I think it is cleaner (anyway, both will be
needed when the delegation is used), but it is agains the description in
Zone::find. So I'd like to ask, is there any reason why we want to return
NS instead of SOA (eg. which should be changed - MemoryZone or Zone's
documentation)?
As this is part of greater work on the in-memory datasource, does it need
a changelog?
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/441#comment:1>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list