BIND 10 #398: we should use more specific tests than EXPECT_TRUE
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Wed Oct 27 23:18:08 UTC 2010
#398: we should use more specific tests than EXPECT_TRUE
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jinmei | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: feature backlog item
Component: Unclassified | Keywords:
Sensitive: 0 | Estimatedhours: 0
Hours: 0 | Billable: 1
Totalhours: 0 | Internal: 0
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
See http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/365#comment:8
In general, when we do
{{{
EXPECT_TRUE(a <op> b);
}}}
it's better to be changed to:
{{{
EXPECT_<op>(a, b);
}}}
because when the test fails the latter will provide more detailed
information (the values of a and b).
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/398>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list