BIND 10 #1063: support delegation (NS and DNAME) case for DatabaseZoneHandle::find()

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Mon Aug 15 15:42:36 UTC 2011


#1063: support delegation (NS and DNAME) case for DatabaseZoneHandle::find()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  vorner
  jinmei                             |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:  task   |             Milestone:
                   Priority:  major  |  Sprint-20110816
                  Component:  data   |            Resolution:
  source                             |             Sensitive:  0
                   Keywords:         |           Sub-Project:  DNS
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |  Estimated Difficulty:  4.0
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |           Total Hours:  0
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jelte):

 * owner:  UnAssigned => vorner


Comment:

 Again, I pushed some small style fixes.

 This may start to get complicated enough to start adding some trace-level
 logging in find()

 I must say I can't immediately think of a much better interface for
 getRRset()
 right now, normally one would use a bitwise flags argument if there are
 multiple
 'options' like this, but direct booleans seem easier given the way is is
 used.

 Regarding tests, splitting them up is probably a good idea :)

 One thing we could add is a test where some data is 'hidden' by a
 delegation (i.e. what happens if i have a bad zone example.org with
 {{{
 sub.example.org. NS ns.foo.bar
 www.sub.example.org. A 192.0.2.1
 }}}
 because of the delegation that A record is out-of-zone data, and a good
 zone-reader should not accept it, but we may not have control over the db
 since
 we go top down i guess it should just give back the delegation and ignore
 the
 record, but it is a test we can add.

 Oh and the somewhat simpler query-for-multiple-levels-below-delegation
 perhaps, as another
 'corner' case (a simple some.levels.below.delegation.example.org. would
 suffice i think).

 For the rest it looks OK.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1063#comment:5>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list