BIND 10 #61: review: dnstime

[BIND 10 Development]

#61: review: dnstime
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                 Reporter:  jinmei   |                Owner:  jinmei
                     Type:  task     |               Status:  accepted
                 Priority:  major    |            Milestone:  A-Team-
                Component:           |  Sprint-20110223
  DNSPacket API                      |           Resolution:
                 Keywords:           |            Sensitive:  0
Estimated Number of Hours:  0.0      |  Add Hours to Ticket:
                Billable?:  0        |          Total Hours:
                Internal?:  0        |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jinmei):

 After looking at the code more closely, comapring it to the BIND 9
 implementation, I propose:

  - provide 32-bit and 64-bit versions, instead of the single time_t
    (whose size may vary on different systems) version
  - (still) not support the unformatted integer second representation.
    BIND 9 doesn't support it either, and since we've not seen a
    problem until now, it's a no issue in practice for now.  So keep it
    simpler until we see the need for it.

 This should be a quite easy task.  I'd give it an estimation of size 2.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/61#comment:11>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development