BIND 10 #601: but in handling out-of-range DNSSEC times

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Wed Feb 23 08:11:34 UTC 2011


#601: but in handling out-of-range DNSSEC times
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
           Reporter:  jinmei         |                      Owner:
               Type:  defect         |  UnAssigned
           Priority:  major          |                     Status:  new
          Component:  DNSPacket API  |                  Milestone:  A-Team-
          Sensitive:  0              |  Task-Backlog
Add Hours to Ticket:  0              |                   Keywords:
        Total Hours:  0              |  Estimated Number of Hours:  0
                                     |                  Billable?:  1
                                     |                  Internal?:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 This is an (originally unintended) continuation of #174.

 According to Rob Austein our current implementation of DNSSEC time
 (which is actually compatible with BIND 9) isn't correct:

  - we should allow pre-epoch time such as 19691231000000 as long as it's
 in the valid 68-year range.
  - we should reject (in the 32-bit mode) out-of-range time format such as
 21000101000000

 In practice, these would be minor, but since we've recently completed
 #174,
 it would make sense to fix it using this opportunity.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/601>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list