BIND 10 #504: CNAME Implementation

[BIND 10 Development]

#504: CNAME Implementation
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                 Reporter:  stephen  |                Owner:  vorner
                     Type:           |               Status:  reviewing
  enhancement                        |            Milestone:  A-Team-
                 Priority:  major    |  Sprint-20110126
                Component:  data     |           Resolution:
  source                             |            Sensitive:  0
                 Keywords:           |  Add Hours to Ticket:  0
Estimated Number of Hours:  5.0      |          Total Hours:  0
                Billable?:  1        |
                Internal?:  0        |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jinmei):

 Replying to [comment:8 jinmei]:

 > >  * Is the different logic under a zone cut needed? I don't see why it
 should be different and maybe it would be simpler to just act the same way
 every time.
 >
 > Good question.  This behavior was copied from BIND 9, and I actually
 > wondered about the rationale of it.  At least I don't know a standard
 > that specifies this behavior.  I'll ask BIND 9 designers/developers
 about
 > the intent, but for now I guess it's okay to remove this special case
 > for simplicity.

 This is done.  Is there anything I should address in the context of
 this branch?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/504#comment:10>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development