BIND 10 #445: Review Recursor cache design

[BIND 10 Development]

#445: Review Recursor cache design
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                 Reporter:           |                Owner:  smann
  zhanglikun                         |               Status:  reviewing
                     Type:  task     |            Milestone:  R-Team-
                 Priority:  major    |  Sprint-20110208
                Component:           |           Resolution:
  resolver                           |            Sensitive:  0
                 Keywords:           |  Add Hours to Ticket:  0
Estimated Number of Hours:  5.0      |          Total Hours:  0
                Billable?:  1        |
                Internal?:  0        |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by smann):

 Hi Likun,

 Yes, I think having at least abstract inputs/outputs makes sense, like:
 "input: query message" and output: "RRSet or failure". The reason I think
 it is important is that this is a design of an API.

 One other thing: Does it make sense to add a description of how the data
 is stored internally? I think it might, if you are doing something for
 performance reasons or memory management reasons. Just a sentence, like:
 "We're using Judy Trie to better manage dynamic allocation and recovery of
 memory resources." If it doesn't make sense to do this, just skip it.

 Otherwise, everything looks good and I think we can close this ticket.
 I'll reassign this to you for any last comments, then I'll mark it as
 fixed/done. Good job!

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://bind10.isc.org/ticket/445#comment:10>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development