BIND 10 #520: xfrin/zonemgr should handle command responses appropriately (was: xfrin/zonmgr should handle command responses appropriately)

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Tue Jun 14 21:00:28 UTC 2011


#520: xfrin/zonemgr should handle command responses appropriately
--------------------------------------+----------------------------------
                   Reporter:  jinmei  |                 Owner:
                       Type:  defect  |                Status:  new
                   Priority:  minor   |             Milestone:  New Tasks
                  Component:  xfrin   |            Resolution:
                   Keywords:          |             Sensitive:  0
            Defect Severity:  N/A     |           Sub-Project:  DNS
Feature Depending on Ticket:          |  Estimated Difficulty:  0.0
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0       |           Total Hours:  0
                  Internal?:  0       |
--------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by jreed):

 * severity:   => N/A
 * subproject:   => DNS
 * milestone:   => New Tasks


Old description:

> This is a continuation of #516.  We need to do a few more things on top
> of
> the urgent care fix:
>
>  - We need more complete tests for the problem of #516.
>  - xfrin and zonmgr should check the command response and take
> appropriate
>    action, especially if the response indicates an error
>
> We should probably consider further extensions, too:
>  - extend command spec to indicate whether it requests a response
>    (see a review comment of #516)
>  - making communication over CC channels asynchronous
>
> But these will even be beyond the scope of this follow up ticket.

New description:

 This is a continuation of #516.  We need to do a few more things on top of
 the urgent care fix:

  - We need more complete tests for the problem of #516.
  - xfrin and zonemgr should check the command response and take
 appropriate
    action, especially if the response indicates an error

 We should probably consider further extensions, too:
  - extend command spec to indicate whether it requests a response
    (see a review comment of #516)
  - making communication over CC channels asynchronous

 But these will even be beyond the scope of this follow up ticket.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://bind10.isc.org/ticket/520#comment:4>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list