BIND 10 #419: Parallel xfrout session should be allowed

[BIND 10 Development]

#419: Parallel xfrout session should be allowed
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                 Reporter:           |                Owner:  vorner
  zhanglikun                         |               Status:  reviewing
                     Type:  defect   |            Milestone:  A-Team-
                 Priority:  major    |  Sprint-20110309
                Component:  xfrout   |           Resolution:
                 Keywords:           |            Sensitive:  0
Estimated Number of Hours:  0.0      |  Add Hours to Ticket:  0
                Billable?:  1        |          Total Hours:  0
                Internal?:  0        |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by zzchen_pku):

 * owner:  zzchen_pku => vorner


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:13 vorner]:
 > The mixin class is in isc.util, which means it should be independent on
 what uses it. But it talks about auth in the comment (it probably
 shouldn't) and introduces threads to all applications that use it. I think
 that is not really OK. Would it be possible to call the
 _handle_request_nonblock() as before and in the case of the xfrout it
 would start the thread like this? Simply wrap it?
 The comments was there before, I have removed it and moved the thread
 logic into xfrout.
 > Anyway, this way has another problem. The mixin test sometimes refuses
 to terminate. I guess it is related to the thread that is started but
 never stops (and it is not a daemon thread, therefore the python waits for
 it to terminate).
 As mentioned above, _handle_request_nonblock() will create a daemon thread
 to handle request.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/419#comment:14>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development