BIND 10 #642: SIGHUP and other signals cause boss to leave BIND 10 processes lying around
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Thu Mar 17 09:10:35 UTC 2011
#642: SIGHUP and other signals cause boss to leave BIND 10 processes lying around
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: shane | Owner: shane
Type: defect | Status: reviewing
Priority: minor | Milestone: A-Team-
Component: Boss of | Sprint-20110316
BIND | Resolution:
Keywords: | Sensitive: 0
Estimated Number of Hours: 0.0 | Add Hours to Ticket: 0
Billable?: 1 | Total Hours: 0
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vorner):
* owner: vorner => shane
Comment:
Hello
I'm not sure if it really works. If I start bind10 on the background (with
&) and I close the terminal, all processes survive for a while, but then
start to die out one by one. I guess it's because they can no longer write
to the terminal that got closed.
It works if I send a TERM signal. But in that case (and in the other cases
as well), it probably shouldn't terminate with 0 status.
And the tests are quite repetitive. Would it be possible to have some kind
of common „body“ of the test and just call it with the name of the signal
to test?
Thanks
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/642#comment:5>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list