BIND 10 #1342: Reintroduce delayed restarts after #213
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Wed Nov 16 13:44:49 UTC 2011
#1342: Reintroduce delayed restarts after #213
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jelte
vorner | Status: reviewing
Type: | Milestone:
defect | Sprint-20111122
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: Boss | Sensitive: 0
of BIND | Sub-Project: Core
Keywords: | Estimated Difficulty: 4
Defect Severity: N/A | Total Hours: 0
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
Add Hours to Ticket: |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vorner):
* owner: vorner => jelte
Comment:
Hello
Replying to [comment:7 jelte]:
> Turns out with the changes from 213, it's actually easier to implement
this, so I've removed the legacy scheduler class and let the component
class handle it's own restarting.
>
> Behaviour of restarts changed slightly; it'll now be restarted X seconds
(default 10) after time of start, not time of death. But the calculation
of restart time is in its own method so we can easily change the
algorithm.
I think that this actually was the original behavior, not 10s after the
death, but 10s after the original start. Anyway, this doesn't seem very
important.
I fixed the boss tests to pass (and pushed), as you removed the
dead_processes variable.
I guess you see no way to test the boss code itself as unittest? Anyway,
you might want to check how components interacts with various kinds and
being killed sooner or later.
Actually, I found a problem with the behaviour. If I choose a needed
component (let's say b10-auth in the default configuration) and kill it
later than 10s after the system started, it is restarted. If I kill it
again soon afterwards, the system stops. However, the semantics of needed
component was to stop only if it fails at startup (with 10s being large
enough time to fit the initialization in there probably), when the user
typed the command and can see the system is ill. But this might happen
after the user went for a holiday, so in this case it shouldn't bring the
system down.
Also, what is the purpose of the restart_delay parameter? Nothing uses it.
And, the description of this parameter is misleading. It assumes the
component is restarted every time, no matter if the component might be
core for example.
Thanks
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1342#comment:9>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list