BIND 10 #1371: IXFR-out protocol handling: normal case
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Mon Nov 21 23:03:46 UTC 2011
#1371: IXFR-out protocol handling: normal case
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jinmei
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: task | Milestone:
Priority: major | Sprint-20111122
Component: | Resolution:
xfrout | Sensitive: 0
Keywords: | Sub-Project: DNS
Defect Severity: N/A | Estimated Difficulty: 6
Feature Depending on Ticket: | Total Hours: 1
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jinmei):
Replying to [comment:11 vorner]:
> It looks OK, just this one thing. The comment in rrsets_equal seems
incomplete, the sentence doesn't seem to have a werb:
> {{{
> +
> + # no accessor for sigs either (so this only checks name, class,
type, ttl,
> + # and rdata)
> + # also, because of the fake data in rrsigs, if the type is rrsig,
the
> + # rdata is not checked
> }}}
Ah, that was actually a "complete" copy of the original implementation
in isc.datasrc.tests, but the comment didn't make sense without the
original description comment for the function. I've revised the
entire docstring/comment to:
{{{#!python
'''Compare two RRsets, return True if equal, otherwise False
We provide this function as part of test utils as we have no direct
rrset
comparison atm. There's no accessor for sigs either (so this only
checks
name, class, type, ttl, and rdata).
Also, since we often use fake data in RRSIGs, RRSIG RDATA are not
checked.
'''
}}}
> Otherwise it seems OK to merge.
Okay, thanks. I'll merge trac1372 to this and then to master, and
close the tickets.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1371#comment:13>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list