BIND 10 #1263: Finish current experimental DHCP benchmarking work

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri Oct 21 13:00:23 UTC 2011


#1263: Finish current experimental DHCP benchmarking work
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  johnd
  stephen                            |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:  task   |             Milestone:  Sprint-
                   Priority:  major  |  DHCP-20111026
                  Component:  dhcp   |            Resolution:
                   Keywords:         |             Sensitive:  0
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |           Sub-Project:  DHCP
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |  Estimated Difficulty:  0
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |           Total Hours:  0
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tomek):

 Replying to [comment:3 johnd]:
 > These look like useful options.
 >
 > Testing how long it takes for some operations could be handled by using
 both -r and -n, with a -d value large enough that the tool will wait a
 long time for any backlog that results to clear.  The statistics would
 then tell how long it took for the backlog to clear.
 >
 > What pass criteria would be be useful to set up, to allow for an
 unambiguous pass result?
 See comments to ticket #1337. I put some ideas there. And don't worry.
 These are not needed for this milestone. That is something we could
 develop eventually.

 > I'm thinking, for the initial version, from these suggestions adding:
 > - The drop-threshold-abort
 > - A version option
 > - Include in the output the version and the parameters used
 > - Explicit description of what the exit status means.  Perhaps just
 status 1 if any dropped packets, unless other pass criteria options are
 added.
 > - A test-period option, which seems to me an alternative to -n.
 >
 > Should any of the other suggested options be in the initial version?
 That sounds fine for this release. It is already ambitious goal as we have
 around a month. Let's not make this even harder.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1263#comment:6>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list