BIND 10 #1595: Make the share name configurable

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Thu Feb 2 18:20:57 UTC 2012


#1595: Make the share name configurable
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  jinmei
  vorner                             |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:  task   |             Milestone:
                   Priority:  major  |  Sprint-20120207
                  Component:         |            Resolution:
  Unclassified                       |             Sensitive:  0
                   Keywords:         |           Sub-Project:  DNS
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |  Estimated Difficulty:  3
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |           Total Hours:  0
  Socket creator, multiple auths     |
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jinmei):

 '''general'''

 In general, I'd like to avoid hardcode specific values like "auth" or
 "resolver" in .cc's.

 '''socket_request.cc'''

 - 'explicit' is now unnecessary for the SocketRequestorCCSession
   constructor.
 - is it okay to pass an empty string for app_name to
   initSocketRequestor() (then to SocketRequestorCCSession)?
 - is it okay to pass non empty share_name to requestSocket() when
   share_mode is not SHARE_SAME?  Also, while it may be inferable, it's
   not clear from the documentation how exactly share_name works with
   SHARE_SAME.

 '''socket_requestor_test.cc'''

 - not new to this case, but I don't see why we need to use ASSERT_xxx
   instead of EXPECT_xxx in the added tests.

 '''testutils/socket_request.h (and auth_srv_unittest)'''

 - related to whether it's okay to pass an empty app_name to
   initSocketRequestor(), test using "" seems to be less reliable.
   Since "" could be used as a default as well, I cannot be so sure if
   name is the default or the string auth_srv_unittest passed (both are
   "") here:
 {{{#!c++
         EXPECT_EQ(expected_app_, name);
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1595#comment:6>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list