BIND 10 #1638: NSEC3PARAM rdata should have more tests

[BIND 10 Development]

#1638: NSEC3PARAM rdata should have more tests
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
            Reporter:  jinmei        |                        Owner:
                Type:  defect        |  UnAssigned
            Priority:  major         |                       Status:  new
           Component:  libdns++      |                    Milestone:  Next-
           Sensitive:  0             |  Sprint-Proposed
         Sub-Project:  DNS           |                     Keywords:
Estimated Difficulty:  0             |              Defect Severity:  N/A
         Total Hours:  0             |  Feature Depending on Ticket:
                                     |          Add Hours to Ticket:  0
                                     |                    Internal?:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 I've found one bug in the NSEC3PARAM rdata implementation while I
 worked on #1575 (see the ticket message), and also noticed the amount
 and quality of tests were quite poor (I suspect we'll find some other
 subtle bugs if we think about more detailed tests).

 Since we are now working on NSEC3, it's probably a good time to
 improve the test (and implementation) quality of this RDATA.

 The test should at least cover:

 - more various types of bogus text data
 - bad wire format data
 - empty salt
 - maybe also very large salt
 - unusually large number of iterations

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1638>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development