BIND 10 #2124: RFC 6594 for SSHFP

[BIND 10 Development]

#2124: RFC 6594 for SSHFP
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  jinmei
  vorner                             |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:         |             Milestone:
  defect                             |  Sprint-20120731
                   Priority:         |            Resolution:
  medium                             |             Sensitive:  0
                  Component:         |           Sub-Project:  DNS
  libdns++                           |  Estimated Difficulty:  2
                   Keywords:         |           Total Hours:  0
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by muks):

 * owner:  muks => jinmei


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:17 jinmei]:
 > Replying to [comment:16 muks]:
 >
 > > > Probably beyond the scope of this task, but now that you've deleted
 > > > "TBD": we still need some more tests, e.g., short data.
 > >
 > > A short fingerprint data test has been added.
 >
 > Ah, sorry, I was not clear enough.  What I actually meant was
 > something like the case where the actual data length is shorter than
 > the given RDATA length (consider, e.g, what if rdata_len = 65535 or
 > the buffer is even empty, etc. )
 >
 > And, talking about these I also wonder what if the fingerprint is
 > empty, both from string and wire cases.  BIND 9 seems to allow that.
 > If we accept it, we'll also make sure that it can be handled correctly
 > in towire and totext.

 Some more tests and some missing unit tests have been added now. Code has
 been changed appropriately.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2124#comment:19>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development