BIND 10 #2093: implement RBNode Node::getAbsoluteLabelSequence
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Tue Jul 31 16:05:54 UTC 2012
#2093: implement RBNode Node::getAbsoluteLabelSequence
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jinmei
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: task | Milestone:
Priority: | Sprint-20120807
medium | Resolution:
Component: data | Sensitive: 0
source | Sub-Project: DNS
Keywords: | Estimated Difficulty: 5
Defect Severity: N/A | Total Hours: 0
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
scalable inmemory |
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jinmei):
Replying to [comment:13 jelte]:
I've fixed one minor typo. With that, I think the branch is okay for
merge.
One side note: I guess we'll need operator== for `LabelSequence`.
I think it's a suboptimal way to test if two sequences are equal by
converting a sequence to text for EXPECT_EQ() and comparing the
results.
> oh, btw, should we remove getName and getAbsoluteName?
Eventually, but details of it will depend on how we deal with the
wildcard case in the main in-memory data source implementation.
See #2150. If we use this shortcut to find a tree node for a wildcard
name (like *.wild.example.com), we can simply remove the above two; if
not, we'd first have to implement a way to construct a `LabelSequence`
for the wildcard name before removing them.
In either case, this will be for a later sprint.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2093#comment:14>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list