BIND 10 #2025: system test for notify
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Wed Jun 27 02:16:31 UTC 2012
#2025: system test for notify
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: vorner
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: task | Milestone:
Priority: high | Sprint-20120703
Component: xfrin | Resolution:
Keywords: | Sensitive: 0
Defect Severity: N/A | Sub-Project: DNS
Feature Depending on Ticket: | Estimated Difficulty: 5
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 | Total Hours: 0
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by muks):
* owner: muks => vorner
Comment:
Replying to [comment:11 vorner]:
> Well, I understand the reason and the meaning of the configuration
variable. And that is exactly what I don't like ‒ having user-facing
configuration that should not be used.
>
> The `also_notify` is something a user might want to use when they need
to send notifies to addresses not listed in the NS records. It seems to me
this is exactly the same feature. So I propose to rename it to also-
notify, make a note about it to #1992 and put it to next-sprint-proposed
to add tests for it. Would that be OK with you?
I've updated the key to `also_notify` now, though it's still limited to
just `address` and `port` keys. Also did some minor cleanup. Will update
#1992 when it hits master.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2025#comment:12>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list