BIND 10 #1772: "two bind10 instances" lettuce test fails
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Wed Mar 28 12:25:59 UTC 2012
#1772: "two bind10 instances" lettuce test fails
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jinmei
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: | Milestone:
defect | Sprint-20120403
Priority: | Resolution:
medium | Sensitive: 0
Component: Boss | Sub-Project: DNS
of BIND | Estimated Difficulty: 5
Keywords: | Total Hours: 0.5
Defect Severity: N/A |
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jelte):
* owner: UnAssigned => jinmei
* totalhours: 0 => 0.5
Comment:
I'm fine with any range of ports or addresses, btw. Also don't mind ::1,
though I do wonder if we want to be able to run this on non-v6 machine (if
not, then all is fine imo, in fact, it may be good to explicitely test v6
as well). I was wondering, perhaps we can also default to different
127.0.0.0/8 addresses (ie. 127.0.0.5 or whatever).
I don't really feel like building in some unused-port-detection for this
class of listening ports, but perhaps we can write a small tool that finds
one (obviously, such a setup would be subject to race conditions if other
applications steal it between the finding and the running of the tests),
but even for that I wonder if it's worth the trouble.
I do worry about that loop; but not sure how it can be prevented if it is
talking to a totally different application.
Anyway, I think this branch is fine to merge as an interim solution.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1772#comment:10>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list