BIND 10 #1901: be consistent with bind10 or boss or bob name

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri May 11 12:07:35 UTC 2012


#1901: be consistent with bind10 or boss or bob name
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:  jreed  |                 Owner:
                       Type:         |                Status:  new
  defect                             |             Milestone:  New Tasks
                   Priority:         |            Resolution:
  medium                             |             Sensitive:  0
                  Component:  Boss   |           Sub-Project:  Core
  of BIND                            |  Estimated Difficulty:  9
                   Keywords:         |           Total Hours:  0
            Defect Severity:         |
  Medium                             |
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by shane):

 * severity:  N/A => Medium


Comment:

 We can't use "bind10" as the module name, because frankly that is
 confusing. It was called "bob" to indicate the "boss... of BIND". I don't
 have any strong preference between "bob" or "boss", although I suspect
 that "boss" is the right answer.

 The internal code is lesser importance, but consistency between process
 naming and logging and the like makes sense.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1901#comment:1>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list