BIND 10 #1901: be consistent with bind10 or boss or bob name
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri May 11 12:07:35 UTC 2012
#1901: be consistent with bind10 or boss or bob name
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jreed | Owner:
Type: | Status: new
defect | Milestone: New Tasks
Priority: | Resolution:
medium | Sensitive: 0
Component: Boss | Sub-Project: Core
of BIND | Estimated Difficulty: 9
Keywords: | Total Hours: 0
Defect Severity: |
Medium |
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by shane):
* severity: N/A => Medium
Comment:
We can't use "bind10" as the module name, because frankly that is
confusing. It was called "bob" to indicate the "boss... of BIND". I don't
have any strong preference between "bob" or "boss", although I suspect
that "boss" is the right answer.
The internal code is lesser importance, but consistency between process
naming and logging and the like makes sense.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1901#comment:1>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list