BIND 10 #1704: log output mixed

[BIND 10 Development]

#1704: log output mixed
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:  jreed  |                 Owner:  muks
                       Type:         |                Status:  reviewing
  defect                             |             Milestone:
                   Priority:         |  Sprint-20120529
  medium                             |            Resolution:
                  Component:         |             Sensitive:  0
  logging                            |           Sub-Project:  Core
                   Keywords:         |  Estimated Difficulty:  15
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |           Total Hours:  0
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by muks):

 Replying to [comment:42 jinmei]:
 > First, I'd like to clarify my position: I'm not necessarily pushing
 > the idea of using the boost framework.  I'm just trying to show
 > various possible options.

 I know.. we are just discussing what would be the best way. :)

 >
 > Then, about this specific point: are you saying this by actually
 > checking the code or the behavior of the boost file lock?  I used the
 > term "RAII" as an idiom, which in this context means "locked" status
 > is the resource and it will be automatically unlocked when the
 > corresponding object is destructed, rather than the resource
 > acquisition in its literal sense.  It doesn't automatically mean
 > opening the file.

 I meant to say that boost's file_lock takes a file path in the constructor
 and when it goes out of extent, would start again by opening the file.

 I've finished implementing the review comments now. Am running some final
 tests. Will update this bug then. This code also uses raii for working
 with exceptions by using a lock object (which takes an fd).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1704#comment:43>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development