BIND 10 #2198: make sure InterprocessSyncLocker is thread safe
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Tue Oct 30 03:59:31 UTC 2012
#2198: make sure InterprocessSyncLocker is thread safe
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: UnAssigned
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: | Milestone:
defect | Sprint-20121106
Priority: | Resolution:
medium | Sensitive: 0
Component: | Sub-Project: Core
logging | Estimated Difficulty: 5
Keywords: | Total Hours: 3.85
Defect Severity: N/A |
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by muks):
Replying to [comment:33 muks]:
> If we are to pick up the `tryLock()` bits of `Mutex` and `Mutex::Locker`
from the other branches, we can test if the `Mutex` in `LoggerManager` is
locked at least, before log4cplus is used. But I'm not sure if we should
test it.. let me know in the review.
This has been implemented now. We check that the `LoggerManager` mutex is
locked during logging calls.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2198#comment:34>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list