BIND 10 #2198: make sure InterprocessSyncLocker is thread safe

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Tue Oct 30 03:59:31 UTC 2012


#2198: make sure InterprocessSyncLocker is thread safe
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  UnAssigned
  jinmei                             |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:         |             Milestone:
  defect                             |  Sprint-20121106
                   Priority:         |            Resolution:
  medium                             |             Sensitive:  0
                  Component:         |           Sub-Project:  Core
  logging                            |  Estimated Difficulty:  5
                   Keywords:         |           Total Hours:  3.85
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by muks):

 Replying to [comment:33 muks]:
 > If we are to pick up the `tryLock()` bits of `Mutex` and `Mutex::Locker`
 from the other branches, we can test if the `Mutex` in `LoggerManager` is
 locked at least, before log4cplus is used. But I'm not sure if we should
 test it.. let me know in the review.

 This has been implemented now. We check that the `LoggerManager` mutex is
 locked during logging calls.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2198#comment:34>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list