BIND 10 #2151: well known "wildcard" LabelSequence
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Mon Sep 10 19:22:07 UTC 2012
#2151: well known "wildcard" LabelSequence
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jelte
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: task | Milestone:
Priority: | Sprint-20120918
medium | Resolution:
Component: | Sensitive: 0
libdns++ | Sub-Project: DNS
Keywords: | Estimated Difficulty: 2
Defect Severity: N/A | Total Hours: 0
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
scalable inmemory |
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by muks):
* owner: muks => jelte
Comment:
Hi Jelte
Here are my review comments:
* If two `.cc` files include `labelsequence.h`, and they use the wildcard
object as a pointer, will the pointer be equal in both? What I mean to ask
here is, would it be better to put its definition in `labelsequence.cc`?
* Because the wildcard is a label sequence, and because it's already in
the `LabelSequence` class namespace, I think it's better to name it just
`LabelSequence::WILDCARD()`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2151#comment:7>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list