BIND 10 #2151: well known "wildcard" LabelSequence

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Mon Sep 10 19:22:07 UTC 2012


#2151: well known "wildcard" LabelSequence
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  jelte
  jinmei                             |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:  task   |             Milestone:
                   Priority:         |  Sprint-20120918
  medium                             |            Resolution:
                  Component:         |             Sensitive:  0
  libdns++                           |           Sub-Project:  DNS
                   Keywords:         |  Estimated Difficulty:  2
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |           Total Hours:  0
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |
  scalable inmemory                  |
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by muks):

 * owner:  muks => jelte


Comment:

 Hi Jelte

 Here are my review comments:

 * If two `.cc` files include `labelsequence.h`, and they use the wildcard
 object as a pointer, will the pointer be equal in both? What I mean to ask
 here is, would it be better to put its definition in `labelsequence.cc`?

 * Because the wildcard is a label sequence, and because it's already in
 the `LabelSequence` class namespace, I think it's better to name it just
 `LabelSequence::WILDCARD()`.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2151#comment:7>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list