BIND 10 #2198: make sure InterprocessSyncLocker is thread safe
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Mon Apr 1 07:27:52 UTC 2013
#2198: make sure InterprocessSyncLocker is thread safe
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jinmei | Owner: muks
Type: defect | Status:
Priority: medium | reviewing
Component: logging | Milestone:
Keywords: | Sprint-20130402
Sensitive: 0 | Resolution:
Sub-Project: Core | CVSS Scoring:
Estimated Difficulty: 5 | Defect Severity: N/A
Total Hours: 3.85 | Feature Depending on Ticket:
| Add Hours to Ticket: 0
| Internal?: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by muks):
Replying to [comment:40 vorner]:
> Looking at the code, it looks sane an mostly OK. Just, around the
lock()/unlock()/tryLock methods in mutex, the comments say not to use the
method directly. But the methods are private. I guess the comment is
useless there.
These are now removed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2198#comment:42>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list