BIND 10 #2035: tickets that will be automatically resolved with the generic zone parser/loader

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Wed Feb 6 22:52:47 UTC 2013


#2035: tickets that will be automatically resolved with the generic zone
parser/loader
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
            Reporter:  jinmei        |                        Owner:
                Type:  defect        |  UnAssigned
            Priority:  medium        |                       Status:  new
           Component:  libdns++      |                    Milestone:
            Keywords:                |  Sprint-20130219
           Sensitive:  0             |                   Resolution:
         Sub-Project:  DNS           |                 CVSS Scoring:
Estimated Difficulty:  3             |              Defect Severity:  N/A
         Total Hours:  0             |  Feature Depending on Ticket:
                                     |          Add Hours to Ticket:  0
                                     |                    Internal?:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jinmei):

 I've examined the referenced tickets, and I believe we can say
 they are basically resolved.  Some notes are:

 - #331: technically, this is incomplete because the use of @ still
  doesn't work for Rdata types that haven't switched to the generic
  lexer (e.g. RRSIG).  But the exceptions should be rare cases,
  and these should be naturally resolved as we complete the remaining
  tickets.
 - #594: these are still open as we've not switched to using the generic
  lexer for DNSKEY and RRSIG.  I'll update the corresponding tickets
  so we can re-enable the tests with these tickets.
 - #1320: it now supports "numerical" RR types such as "TYPE5300", but
  the `\#` notation isn't accepted for well-known types such as TYPE51
  (NSEC3PARAM, used in the example of the ticket, until we complete
  #2523.  But that's not the main subject of the ticket, and, in any
  case that's a super rare case and I believe we can leave it to #2523.

 As a result, I'm closing this ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2035#comment:11>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list