BIND 10 #2743: regression due to #2145
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Thu Feb 14 22:48:47 UTC 2013
#2743: regression due to #2145
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jinmei | Owner:
Type: defect | UnAssigned
Priority: medium | Status:
Component: logging | reviewing
Keywords: | Milestone: Next-
Sensitive: 0 | Sprint-Proposed
Sub-Project: Core | Resolution:
Estimated Difficulty: 0 | CVSS Scoring:
Total Hours: 0 | Defect Severity: N/A
| Feature Depending on Ticket:
| Add Hours to Ticket: 0
| Internal?: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jinmei):
* subproject: DNS => Core
Old description:
> It turned out #2145 introduced a regression where cfgmgr initializes
> logging before loading datasrc module, leading to awkward log messages
> and lettuce failure:
> http://git.bind10.isc.org/~tester/builder/BIND10-lettuce/20130214190419-MacOSX10.6-x86_64-GCC/logs/lettuce.out
>
> A temporary workaround is to simply revert the change, and it was
> done in the trac2145-revert branch.
>
> Its urgency for master may be debatable. While embarrassing, we can
> suppress it by running lettuce without specifying
> `--enable-logger-checks`, and by ignoring other awkward log messages.
>
> At the moment I'm just moving it to the review queue as a candidate
> task for the next sprint.
New description:
It turned out #2145 introduced a regression where cfgmgr initializes
logging before loading datasrc module, leading to awkward log messages
and lettuce failure:
http://git.bind10.isc.org/~tester/builder/BIND10-lettuce/20130214190419-MacOSX10.6-x86_64-GCC/logs/lettuce.out
A temporary workaround is to simply revert the change, and it was
done in the trac2145-revert branch.
Its urgency for master may be debatable. While embarrassing, we can
suppress it by running lettuce without specifying
`--enable-logger-checks`, and by ignoring other awkward log messages.
(note also: if we complete #2746 we don't need the revert).
At the moment I'm just moving it to the review queue as a candidate
task for the next sprint.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2743#comment:2>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list