BIND 10 #2782: bind10 is not compilable with boost 1.53.0

[BIND 10 Development]

#2782: bind10 is not compilable with boost 1.53.0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
            Reporter:  atkac         |                        Owner:
                Type:  defect        |                       Status:  new
            Priority:  medium        |                    Milestone:  New
           Component:  Unclassified  |  Tasks
            Keywords:                |                   Resolution:
           Sensitive:  0             |                 CVSS Scoring:
         Sub-Project:  Core          |              Defect Severity:  N/A
Estimated Difficulty:  0             |  Feature Depending on Ticket:
         Total Hours:  0             |          Add Hours to Ticket:  0
                                     |                    Internal?:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by atkac):

 Replying to [comment:1 jinmei]:
 > Replying to [ticket:2782 atkac]:
 > > Current bind10 (I used bind10 beta but current git master is also
 broken) is not compilable with boost 1.53.0. Compilation ends with
 following error:
 > >
 > > /usr/include/boost/archive/iterators/transform_width.hpp:144:55:
 error: no 'operator++(int)' declared for postfix '++' [-fpermissive]
 > >
 > > The main reason is that boost 1.53.0 changed transform_width.hpp
 header and their transform_width() method now postincrements
 this->base_reference() object. Previous versions preincrements this
 objects. Since Encode/DecodeNormalizer classes define only preincrement
 operators, compilation fails.
 > >
 > > I will attach the patch but please note this might be a bug in boost
 because postincrementation requires more CPU & memory because
 Encode/DecodeNormalizer object must be copied.
 >
 > Thanks for the report.  We already noticed it (see #2764), and, as
 > noted in that ticket, I've also reported the issue to the Boost
 > developer: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8081

 Heh, same patch as I suggested in RH bug
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912507 :)

 > Is it okay to close this ticket as a duplicate?

 Of course, close this ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2782#comment:2>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development