BIND 10 #1894: use labelsequence in findNSEC3
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri Feb 14 07:23:55 UTC 2014
#1894: use labelsequence in findNSEC3
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jelte | Owner: muks
Type: enhancement | Status:
Priority: high | closed
Component: Unclassified | Milestone:
Keywords: | bind10-1.2-release-freeze
Sensitive: 0 | Resolution: fixed
Sub-Project: DNS | CVSS Scoring:
Estimated Difficulty: 5 | Defect Severity: N/A
Total Hours: 0 | Feature Depending on Ticket:
| Add Hours to Ticket: 0
| Internal?: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by muks):
* status: reviewing => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Merged to `master` branch in commit
`fe7ae0a7b3eca38b81779b9cad22161e4bcf1d26`:
{{{
* 7c1e2ec [1894] Minor coding style fix
* f2ce3de [1894] Avoid doing costly name splits (database backend)
* 498b511 [1894] Add missing method
* aff22ac [1894] Use a single LabelSequence object instead of doing costly
name splits
* 4aef41d [1894] Add LabelSequence version of NSEC3Hash::calculate()
* e29050c [1894] Avoid expensive Name copy
}}}
There was a merge conflict, but the exact code that was the result of the
resolution has been reviewed in this ticket.
Resolving as fixed. Thank you for the reviews Paul.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1894#comment:10>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list