BIND 10 #254: we should revisit RRset::setName() (was: [kean] we should revisit RRset::setName())

[BIND 10 Development]

#254: we should revisit RRset::setName()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
            Reporter:  jinmei        |                        Owner:
                Type:  defect        |  UnAssigned
            Priority:  medium        |                       Status:
           Component:  data source   |  closed
            Keywords:                |                    Milestone:
           Sensitive:  0             |  Sprint-20131015
         Sub-Project:  DNS           |                   Resolution:
Estimated Difficulty:  3             |  duplicate
         Total Hours:                |                 CVSS Scoring:
                                     |              Defect Severity:
                                     |  Medium
                                     |  Feature Depending on Ticket:
                                     |          Add Hours to Ticket:
                                     |                    Internal?:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by muks):

 * status:  assigned => closed
 * resolution:   => duplicate


Comment:

 Please don't pick this ticket. I've fixed #2335 and will resolve this
 ticket as part of it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/254#comment:12>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development