BIND 10 #525: handle "singleton" RR types
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Thu Jan 30 04:14:17 UTC 2014
#525: handle "singleton" RR types
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jinmei | Owner: muks
Type: enhancement | Status:
Priority: medium | reviewing
Component: libdns++ | Milestone:
Keywords: | bind10-1.2-release-freeze
Sensitive: 0 | Resolution:
Sub-Project: DNS | CVSS Scoring:
Estimated Difficulty: 0.0 | Defect Severity: N/A
Total Hours: 0 | Feature Depending on Ticket:
| Add Hours to Ticket: 0
| Internal?: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by pselkirk):
* owner: pselkirk => muks
Comment:
If I understand you correctly, having more than one SOA in an RRset is an
error, but we have code elsewhere to catch that, and the unittests are
considered useful. But we don't have code elsewhere to catch multiple
CNAME or DNAME RRs.
Anyway, the question for me comes back to this: Every line of code has a
cost - to write, review, test, maintain, and execute. Is the added
security for RRset::addRdata() (for CNAME and DNAME, minus SOA) worth
either the man-hours or the milliseconds? If yes, then merge and close as
fixed. If no, then close as wontfix.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/525#comment:14>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list