[Bind10-uides] proof of cluelessness and a general question

[Jerry Scharf]

Hi folks,

I presented some of the basic ideas and both Shane, the person who I 
work for, and the team seem in general to like it. One person said that 
the macro system that DHCP uses is worth looking at. "Once we explain to 
them what to add and where to add it, they can get their jobs done quite 
well." Damning with faint praise. I am afraid I was not too kind in 
response.

One of the people who had the highest risk of having a cow was quite 
supportive in principal and wanted to start wordsmithing the terms I had 
chosen. He now wants the management data model/store to be logically 
part of the server. I don't think he understands the full implications 
of this (botnet C&C, here we come.) At least this time I get to spec it, 
create the road map and then run away. :)


So I read the BIND 10 specs and I hear people like Ben talk about 
RESTful interfaces. The way I read it, if I want to have a login session 
or worse open a set of commands to be treated as a transaction, I need 
to defeat the concept of RESTfullness somewhere. Am I missing something 
or is this one of the less useful design concepts for a management tool?


A second and more serious question. How do things like virtualization 
and cloud computing change the way DNS is used and the object structures 
that the management tool needs to cope with? I have a  suspicion that 
this is one of those things that either we put some hard thought into or 
it will bite us when we roll it out.

jerry