Issues with bindctl execute

[Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.]

> Right, that sounds like a useful addition. I was originally thinking of a dumb wait, but since bindctl wouldn't update itself during execute it would also need some explicit update command (currently it does so automatically after each manual command, but it is potentially a very expensive operation at this point, so it does not do so during execute).

> Those two would be really easy to implement, but making one that calls update;check-if-exists;wait for a while would probably cover these use-cases anyway, and wouldn't even be that much harder.

> I created a ticket to implement such a thing:
> http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1987

Thank you. I will keep an eye on this ticket. Jeff.