Xfrout notify question

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 jinmei at isc.org
Thu May 24 19:25:26 UTC 2012


At Thu, 24 May 2012 19:13:38 +0000,
"Spain, Dr. Jeffry A." <spainj at countryday.net> wrote:

> > With my understanding that manually invoked notify is working as a workaround for you, "also-notify" can wait, e.g., for several months.
> > Am I understanding it correctly?
> 
> In my configuration a Bind 10 stealth master is using a Bind 9.9 server as a slave for DNSSEC inline signing. That Bind 9.9 server is not listed in the NS records of any of the zones. Therefore manually invoked notify isn't working. However, given your anticipated development work in this area, I can still abide by your schedule, several months if necessary. What happens in practice is that the Bind 9.9 slave does a periodic SOA query to the Bind 10 stealth master (I think it is once per hour). Therefore zone updates are propagated no more than an hour after they are made. Thus my system isn't broken, just less responsive than it could be.

Hmm, okay.

It's ticket #1992.  http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1992

I've put it in the proposed queue for the next sprint.  We'll discuss
how urgent it is in the next sprint planning meeting.

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.


More information about the bind10-users mailing list