More cleanup that needs to be done when an interface isremoved

[Brian J. Murrell]

from the quill of "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon at nominum.com> on scroll
<200002152042.MAA02894 at grosse.manhattan.fugue.com>
> 
> I noticed that you added some code in the patch you sent - does that
> mean you answered this question for yourself?

For the most part, I think so.  It is probably the most shakey of
everything I wrote.  Mainly that I have not figured out how "io" objects
fit into the OMAPI scheme.  I based the destroy on the "create" but found
that I had to weed out destroying of non-interface objects.

It works, but is admittedly not elegant.

> I don't know off the
> top of my head - haven't looked at that code in two months.

OK.  Perhaps when you get to auditing the whole client OMAPI interface
implementation it will come back to you and you will slap your forehead and
ROTFL at what I did.  :-)

b.



--
Brian J. Murrell                                    Brian_Murrell at ssd.bctel.net
BCTel Advanced Communications                                      604 454 5279
Vancouver, B.C.