Problems with Lots of Static DHCP Mappings

[Neff_Glen at emc.com]

Then how is it that it's never been a problem 'til we added the past 10 =
or
so mappings?  The mappings have grown gradually over a year and a half.

Thanks,
-G


/*
   Glen R. J. Neff
   neff_glen at emc.com
   919-248-6145

   Dirty deeds done for a meager 20% markup. . .=20
*/

-----Original Message-----
From: Andr=E9 Mamitzsch [mailto:a.mamitzsch at ccgmbh.de]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 10:14
To: dhcp-hackers at isc.org
Subject: AW: Problems with Lots of Static DHCP Mappings

That's the problem. You should not have any static declarations in the
dynamic range.

Example:

subnet 10.6.8.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 {
=3D09
        !!! range 10.6.9.0 10.6.10.255; !!!
        option routers 10.6.8.1;
        option broadcast-address 10.6.11.255;
}

host rtp90984 { hardware ethernet 00:80:17:28:be:76; fixed-address !!!!
10.6.9.84 !!!!; option host-name "rtp90984"; }