dhcpd problem on virtual machines
David W. Hankins
dhankins at isc.org
Mon Jun 14 16:12:07 UTC 2010
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:16:29PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> If that's possible that sounds great. However, the PARTIAL flag is per skb
> so I can't see how you could find out whether a specific packet
> requires checksumming by querying the socket.... I must have missed
> something :-)
The flag is set on the control block read from recv, if memory serves,
so it is packet specific.
> Do you know when the fix is likely to make it into the source?
Not specifically. It won't make 4.2.0 for sure. 4.3 is a candidate.
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-hackers/attachments/20100614/ef9af629/attachment.bin>
More information about the dhcp-hackers
mailing list