How should multiple routers be handled by the client?

[David W. Hankins]

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:57:24AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> dhcp-options(5) just says that they should be listed in order of preference,
> which to me says that Debian is currently doing it wrong, and we need to
> iterate over the list of routers in reverse so that the first router wins.

You either want all of them installed in the routing table in some
way, or the first one.

This also buttresses up against the classless route option, if I
recall correctly, as I think it's legal to specify 0/0 as a route...

-- 
David W. Hankins	BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
Software Engineer		There just aren't enough in our heads.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		http://bind10.isc.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-hackers/attachments/20100622/4ddb10f7/attachment.bin>