multiple pools in shared networks
Aaron Thompson
athompson at mac.com
Mon Aug 21 18:14:15 UTC 2006
I might be missing something but by doing this doesn't it double the
amount of broadcast traffic? Wouldn't it be better to split it
virtually/ip helper address and just keep them as separate subnets?
On Aug 21, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Jeff Wieland wrote:
> We have a need to add a space to an already filled network, so we
> were considering setting up a shared network to run over the same
> physical network as the original pool. Something along the lines of
>
> shared-network big-network {
> subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> authoritative;
> option routers 192.168.0.1;
> pool {
> range 192.168.0.10 192.168.0.250;
> }
> }
> subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> authoritative;
> option routers 192.168.1.1;
> pool {
> range 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.250;
> }
> }
> }
>
> Will this be able to allocate IP's from both ranges?
> --
> Jeff Wieland | Purdue University
> Network Systems Administrator | IT-Infrastructure
> Voice: (765)496-8234 | 501 Harrison Street
> FAX: (765)494-6620 | West Lafayette, IN 47907-2025
>
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list