Failover without shared-network?

[Simon Hobson]

Ken Roberts wrote:

>subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>   # NO DHCP!
>   authoritative;
>   deny unknown-clients;
>   option routers 192.168.2.1;
>   host mercury       { fixed-address 192.168.2.11; hardware ethernet 
>00:01:03:25:80:89; }
>   host mars          { fixed-address 192.168.2.14; hardware ethernet 
>00:01:03:25:6F:93; }
>   # more host declarations...
>}

Whilst not directly related to your problem, note that host 
declarations are global in scope - so putting them inside a subnet 
declaration is likely to cause you confusion sooner or later.

Simon