Linux bind / dhcp iowait status
Glenn Satchell
Glenn.Satchell at uniq.com.au
Thu Mar 16 09:47:34 UTC 2006
If you have the opportunity to do it, perhaps you could shut down one
of the main services (dhcp, dns, mysql, etc) for, say, 5 minutes at a
time and see if that made a difference.
regards,
-glenn
>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:37:46 -0500
>From: "Tom Greaser" <tgreaser at hsc.wvu.edu>
>To: <dhcp-users at isc.org>
>Subject: Re: Linux bind / dhcp iowait status
>
>also too..
>sorry i dont have the sar data avaliable
>to go that far back from where i had the
>phones also running dhcp leases every 4 hours..
>
>but im thinking that didnt seem to make to much of a diff..
>
>
>
>im going to break the mirror tonight and
>see if is a hardware issue..
>
>Thanks again for the echos..
>
>
>
>>>>dhcp at thehobsons.co.uk 03/15/06 12:06 pm >>>
>Tom Greaser wrote:
>
>>have a beefy box that shows 18.40 % iowait at PEAK times
>>and as low as 5.50 % during work hours..
>>
>>have 2000 phones lease set to 1 day
>>
>>2000 pc lease set to 4 hours..
>>
>>running ddns on this host ...
>>
>>just wanting to see if this is "normal"
>>
>>will track down to see if its named or dhcpd doing the bulk of IO
>wait..
>>
>>Its an Redhat AS 4 update 3 box with mirrored scsi Ultra 320 drives
>>10000 rpm
>>bind-9.2.4-7
>>dhcp-3.0.1
>>
>>from free -h
>>buffer 137meg cache 1627 meg
>
>That sounds exceedingly high IF the box is only doing DHCP and DNS.
>In fact I'd consider 5.5% to be exceedingly high for such a box.
>
>What else is running on the box ?
>
>Does it make any difference if you increase lease times as Glenn
>suggests ?
>
>
>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list