dhcp at thehobsons.co.uk
Wed May 31 17:06:31 UTC 2006
Shlomo Dubrowin wrote:
>I understand that the secondary won't go into "partner down" state, but
>shouldn't the secondary give out it's "backup" leases? When the primary is
>down, no leases are being given out. From what I've read, the secondary
>should still be handing out it's automatically created "backup" scope of
>IPs. Is this not correct? or does the "Communications interrupted" mode
>cause problems with that?
See Glenns posting earlier today in the thread "failover or vrrp".
More information about the dhcp-users