FW: No free leases

[Marcos Iuato]

Hi Simon,

Thanks for your recommendation, but I have to use this configuration 
becouse we use it to inform to that group of terminal which is the nfs 
server. We can have more than a nfs server in one subnet.

For this case, there is better configuration?

Cheers,
Marcos Iuato

Simon Hobson escreveu:
> Marcos Iuato wrote:
> 
> 
>>subnet 192.168.11.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>         option subnet-mask            255.255.255.0;
>>         option broadcast-address      192.168.11.255;
>>         option routers                192.168.11.251;
>>         option domain-name-servers    192.168.11.251;
>>         option domain-name            "vlan2";
>>
>>         filename "/pxelinux.0";
>>
>>         group {
>>                next-server 192.168.11.253;
>>
>>                # Host Terminal:vlan2:47
>>                     host 192.168.21.120 {
>>                     hardware ethernet 00:13:90:00:F2:0F;
>>                     fixed-address 192.168.11.120;
>>                }
>>                # Host Terminal:vlan2:48
>>                     host 192.168.21.121 {
>>                     hardware ethernet 00:13:90:01:0C:82;
>>                     fixed-address 192.168.11.121;
>>                }
>>                # Host Terminal:vlan2:48
>>                     host 192.168.21.122 {
>>                     hardware ethernet 00:13:90:00:F3:DA;
>>                     fixed-address 192.168.11.122;
>>                }
>>         }
>>}
> 
> 
> Note that you have put host declarations inside a subnet declaration. 
> This is generally considered a bad thing. Host statements should be 
> treated as global and placed in the global scope (ie outside of any 
> subnet declarations) or you can get some subtle and difficult to 
> diagnose problems.
> 
> The clients will inherit settings from the subnet automatically.
> 
> Simon
>